<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When the Pieces Fall Together</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jackiebarbosa.com/2009/01/30/when-the-pieces-fall-together/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jackiebarbosa.com/2009/01/30/when-the-pieces-fall-together/</link>
	<description>History Made Hot</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:22:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie Barbosa</title>
		<link>http://www.jackiebarbosa.com/2009/01/30/when-the-pieces-fall-together/comment-page-1/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie Barbosa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://authorjackiebarbosa.wordpress.com/2009/01/30/when-the-pieces-fall-together/#comment-161</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;and I mean this from both men and women, because let&#039;s face it, in reality, how many men in Regency England would go down on a woman?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;LOL, I have two reactions to that:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1) Judging by some of the erotic art I&#039;ve seen from the period, I&#039;m not sure it was any rarer then than it is today.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2) Um, how many men go down on women now? (Not to get into TMI territory, but in my somewhat ancient and slightly limited experience, it&#039;s nowhere near 100%, lol. Why do you think I got MARRIED! Okay, that wasn&#039;t the only reason but...you get my drift.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>and I mean this from both men and women, because let&#8217;s face it, in reality, how many men in Regency England would go down on a woman?</i></p>
<p>LOL, I have two reactions to that:</p>
<p>1) Judging by some of the erotic art I&#8217;ve seen from the period, I&#8217;m not sure it was any rarer then than it is today.</p>
<p>2) Um, how many men go down on women now? (Not to get into TMI territory, but in my somewhat ancient and slightly limited experience, it&#8217;s nowhere near 100%, lol. Why do you think I got MARRIED! Okay, that wasn&#8217;t the only reason but&#8230;you get my drift.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Courtney Milan</title>
		<link>http://www.jackiebarbosa.com/2009/01/30/when-the-pieces-fall-together/comment-page-1/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Courtney Milan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://authorjackiebarbosa.wordpress.com/2009/01/30/when-the-pieces-fall-together/#comment-162</guid>
		<description>I am so with you.  I love some kinds of research, and historical detail matters to me.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But mostly, for me it is a matter of consistency.  For instance, I think it&#039;s okay to, um, write characters who are perhaps more sexually aware than people in the Regency might have been--and I mean this from both men and women, because let&#039;s face it, in reality, how many men in Regency England would go down on a woman?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;EXACTLY.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But that being said, I agree that to me it&#039;s all about the consistency of the world building.  If you&#039;re writing something where everyone is truly Jane Austen, you can&#039;t suddenly have people get up and jump in the sack and be completely wild.  You have to build a historical world where sack-wildness is believable and consistent.  And if you&#039;re writing a world where werewolves do not get humans pregnant, you can&#039;t just change it without explanation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so with you.  I love some kinds of research, and historical detail matters to me.</p>
<p>But mostly, for me it is a matter of consistency.  For instance, I think it&#8217;s okay to, um, write characters who are perhaps more sexually aware than people in the Regency might have been&#8211;and I mean this from both men and women, because let&#8217;s face it, in reality, how many men in Regency England would go down on a woman?</p>
<p>EXACTLY.</p>
<p>But that being said, I agree that to me it&#8217;s all about the consistency of the world building.  If you&#8217;re writing something where everyone is truly Jane Austen, you can&#8217;t suddenly have people get up and jump in the sack and be completely wild.  You have to build a historical world where sack-wildness is believable and consistent.  And if you&#8217;re writing a world where werewolves do not get humans pregnant, you can&#8217;t just change it without explanation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

