<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Musing on Monday: Digital Rights for the New Millenium</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jackiebarbosa.com/2009/07/13/musing-on-monday-digital-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jackiebarbosa.com/2009/07/13/musing-on-monday-digital-rights/</link>
	<description>History Made Hot</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:22:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie Barbosa</title>
		<link>http://www.jackiebarbosa.com/2009/07/13/musing-on-monday-digital-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-1387</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie Barbosa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackiebarbosa.com/?p=583#comment-1387</guid>
		<description>Right, as I said in my response to that comment at the time it was made, I&#039;ve always been paid by percentage based on the cover price by my epublishers. In fact, it&#039;s my NY book that has the digital royalty paid on net. At 25% of net, I still earn more per copy sold on digital copies than on print copies, but it could be SO much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, as I said in my response to that comment at the time it was made, I&#8217;ve always been paid by percentage based on the cover price by my epublishers. In fact, it&#8217;s my NY book that has the digital royalty paid on net. At 25% of net, I still earn more per copy sold on digital copies than on print copies, but it could be SO much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nadia Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.jackiebarbosa.com/2009/07/13/musing-on-monday-digital-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-1386</link>
		<dc:creator>Nadia Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 03:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackiebarbosa.com/?p=583#comment-1386</guid>
		<description>Not all epublishers pay on net.  Samhain, Loose-ID, Carina, etc. all calculate royalty based on the cover price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not all epublishers pay on net.  Samhain, Loose-ID, Carina, etc. all calculate royalty based on the cover price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.jackiebarbosa.com/2009/07/13/musing-on-monday-digital-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-467</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackiebarbosa.com/?p=583#comment-467</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m so bummed. I wrote a long, cogent response to you, Elizabeth, and WordPress ate it :(.

Anyway, I do want to say that my epublisher has never, ever paid my royalties based on net as you describe. My royalties have always been based on the actual sales price. Now, if the book is paid through a secondary retailer, the percentage paid is lower to account for the cut the distributor is taking out of my publisher&#039;s pocket. But no, my royalties are never a percentage of net--they are always a percentage of actual sales price.

Long story short--if your publisher is paying on net, it&#039;s even MORE of a reason to insist on a higher royalty rate for your digital books. One reason the relatively low royalty rate for print (6.5%-10% of cover is typical, I think) is fair is because we know the publisher rarely ever gets paid the actual cover price for any individual sale of the book. The publisher is more of a wholesaler than anything else, and the actual amount received for any copy book sold is obviously much less than the cover price, regardless of the price the retailer gets for it.

But in digital, the cost of creating the one copy is the same as the cost of creating 10,000 or even 1,000,000. That means, if we&#039;re getting paid on net for those, it&#039;s even a stronger reason to demand a higher royalty rate. 15% of net on $3.50 is far too low, IMO. 15% of gross on $7.00 (if, indeed, the publisher is actually ceding 50% of that to the distributor) isn&#039;t so horrendous.

The devil is in the details and few people are talking about these details. And that means the found money is going to wind up almost exclusively in the pockets of the publishers. Which, right now, may not seem like such a bad thing, but when digital becomes the dominant mode of distribution (and it will...maybe not in 10 years or even 20, but in 50, I&#039;d guess it will be), that&#039;s going to haunt us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so bummed. I wrote a long, cogent response to you, Elizabeth, and WordPress ate it <img src='http://www.jackiebarbosa.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>Anyway, I do want to say that my epublisher has never, ever paid my royalties based on net as you describe. My royalties have always been based on the actual sales price. Now, if the book is paid through a secondary retailer, the percentage paid is lower to account for the cut the distributor is taking out of my publisher&#8217;s pocket. But no, my royalties are never a percentage of net&#8211;they are always a percentage of actual sales price.</p>
<p>Long story short&#8211;if your publisher is paying on net, it&#8217;s even MORE of a reason to insist on a higher royalty rate for your digital books. One reason the relatively low royalty rate for print (6.5%-10% of cover is typical, I think) is fair is because we know the publisher rarely ever gets paid the actual cover price for any individual sale of the book. The publisher is more of a wholesaler than anything else, and the actual amount received for any copy book sold is obviously much less than the cover price, regardless of the price the retailer gets for it.</p>
<p>But in digital, the cost of creating the one copy is the same as the cost of creating 10,000 or even 1,000,000. That means, if we&#8217;re getting paid on net for those, it&#8217;s even a stronger reason to demand a higher royalty rate. 15% of net on $3.50 is far too low, IMO. 15% of gross on $7.00 (if, indeed, the publisher is actually ceding 50% of that to the distributor) isn&#8217;t so horrendous.</p>
<p>The devil is in the details and few people are talking about these details. And that means the found money is going to wind up almost exclusively in the pockets of the publishers. Which, right now, may not seem like such a bad thing, but when digital becomes the dominant mode of distribution (and it will&#8230;maybe not in 10 years or even 20, but in 50, I&#8217;d guess it will be), that&#8217;s going to haunt us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Burton</title>
		<link>http://www.jackiebarbosa.com/2009/07/13/musing-on-monday-digital-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-466</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Burton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 02:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackiebarbosa.com/?p=583#comment-466</guid>
		<description>Okay, first, your figures are skewed because you&#039;re comparing two different royalty bases. Most digi-publishers pay on &lt;i&gt;net&lt;/i&gt;, while traditional royalty rates are based on cover price. So, in point of fact, the actual rate of return would be approximately the same.

So, on an ebook priced at $7 sold via eReader, the publisher receives $3.50 and the author receives royalty on that amount not the original $7. If the vendor discounts the sale price, some digi-pubs will still pay the $1.75 but some may choose to split the lower net.

Second, I think it will be a long hard battle, even if the major bestselling authors jump in, before traditional publisher will up the ebook royalty rate. It&#039;s found money.

I know, I know--they insist it costs them the same to make the ebook as the print one. What they really mean is that they factor all the print production costs as equally ebook production costs. However, given that any ebook sale is likely a sale that would otherwise not have been made because those who prefer ebooks are rarely going to buy a hardcover or even a paperback, the revenue from that sale is, in fact, money the publisher would not otherwise have received.

Ergo: found money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, first, your figures are skewed because you&#8217;re comparing two different royalty bases. Most digi-publishers pay on <i>net</i>, while traditional royalty rates are based on cover price. So, in point of fact, the actual rate of return would be approximately the same.</p>
<p>So, on an ebook priced at $7 sold via eReader, the publisher receives $3.50 and the author receives royalty on that amount not the original $7. If the vendor discounts the sale price, some digi-pubs will still pay the $1.75 but some may choose to split the lower net.</p>
<p>Second, I think it will be a long hard battle, even if the major bestselling authors jump in, before traditional publisher will up the ebook royalty rate. It&#8217;s found money.</p>
<p>I know, I know&#8211;they insist it costs them the same to make the ebook as the print one. What they really mean is that they factor all the print production costs as equally ebook production costs. However, given that any ebook sale is likely a sale that would otherwise not have been made because those who prefer ebooks are rarely going to buy a hardcover or even a paperback, the revenue from that sale is, in fact, money the publisher would not otherwise have received.</p>
<p>Ergo: found money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

